Legislature(1995 - 1996)
1995-04-06 House Journal
Full Journal pdf1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1081 HB 100 Amendment No. 19 was offered by Representative MacLean: Page 37, line 22: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "5,249,000" Insert "4,970,100" Under General Fund: Delete "5,249,000" Insert "4,970,100" Page 37, line 24: Under Allocations: Delete "500,000" Insert "221,100" Page 13, line 26: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "978,700" Insert "1,257,600" Under General Fund: Delete "819,800" Insert "1,098,700" 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1082 HB 100 Adjust funding sources accordingly. Representative MacLean moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 19 be adopted. Representative Kohring objected. Representative MacLean placed a call of the House. The call was satisfied. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 19 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 19 YEAS: 14 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Mackie, MacLean, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, Masek And so, Amendment No. 19 was not adopted. Amendment No. 20 was offered by Representative Brown: Page 33, line 4: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "15,243,300" Insert "13,662,300" 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1083 HB 100 Under Other Funds: Delete "15,243,300" Insert "13,662,300" Page 33, line 8: Under Allocations: Delete "3,979,900" Insert "2,398,900" Page 14, following line 16, insert: APPROPRIATION GENERAL ITEMS FUNDS "Public Broadcasting Commission - Public Television 1,581,000 1,581,000 Adjust funding sources accordingly. Representative Brown moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 20 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 20 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 20 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Grussendorf, Kubina, Mackie, MacLean, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1084 HB 100 Excused: Barnes, Masek Absent: Finkelstein And so, Amendment No. 20 was not adopted. Amendment No. 21 was offered by Representative Brice: Page 37, line 15: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "20,166,700" Insert "20,066,700" Under General Fund: Delete "20,054,700" Insert "19,954,700" Page 37, line 16: Under Allocations: Delete "4,127,700" Insert "4,027,700" Page 33, line 17: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "3,093,700" Insert "3,193,700 Under General Fund: Delete "2,737,500" Insert "2,837,500" Page 33, line 18: Under Allocations: Delete "724,300" Insert "824,300" Adjust funding sources accordingly. Representative Brice moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 21 be adopted. 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1085 HB 100 Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 21 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 21 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 21 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 5 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Mackie, Navarre, Robinson, Willis Nays: G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, Masek Absent: Austerman, Bunde, MacLean, Moses, Nicholia And so, Amendment No. 21 was not adopted. Amendment No. 22 was offered by Representative Mackie: Page 7, line 11: Delete "28,263,200" Insert "28,513,200" Adjust funding sources accordingly. Representative Mackie moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 22 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 22 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1086 HB 100 CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 22 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Mackie, Navarre, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, Masek Absent: MacLean, Nicholia And so, Amendment No. 22 was not adopted. Amendment No. 23 was offered by Representative Davies: Page 24, line 18: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "5,283,800" Insert "5,133,800" Under General Fund: Delete "4,626,000" Insert "4,476,000" Page 24, line 23: Under Allocations: Delete "1,145,000" Insert "995,000" Page 26, line 18: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "7,894,100" Insert "7,994,100" 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1087 HB 100 Under General Fund: Delete "5,621,600" Insert "5,721,600" Page 26, line 21 Under Allocations: Delete "6,696,800" Adjust funding sources accordingly. Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 23 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 23 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 23 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, Masek Absent: Mackie, MacLean And so, Amendment No. 23 was not adopted. Amendment No. 24 was offered by Representative B.Davis, Brice and Robinson: 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1088 HB 100 Page 25, line 38: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "37,122,300" Insert "36,922,300" Under Other Funds: Delete "10,892,900" Insert "10,692,900" Page 26, line 17: Under Allocations: Delete "2,946,500" Insert "2,746,500" Page 21, line 23: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "61,715,300" Insert "61,915,300" Under General Fund: Delete "23,153,600" Insert "23,353,600" Page 21, line 26: Under Allocations: Delete "6,366,500" Insert "6,566,500" Adjust funding sources accordingly. Representative B.Davis moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 24 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 24 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1089 HB 100 CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 24 YEAS: 14 NAYS: 22 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Mackie, MacLean, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, Masek Absent: James, Moses And so, Amendment No. 24 was not adopted. Amendment No. 25 was offered by Representative Kubina: Page 37, line 15: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "20,166,700" Insert "19,766,700" Under General Fund: Delete "20,054,700" Insert "19,654,700" Page 37, line 18: Under Allocations: Delete "6,047,000" Insert "5,647,000" Page 22, line 4: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "7,717,400" Insert "8,117,400" 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1090 HB 100 Under General Fund: Delete "6,986,700" Insert "7,386,700" Page 22, line 5: Under Allocations: Delete "4,552,600" Insert "4,952,600" Adjust funding sources accordingly. Representative Kubina moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 25 be adopted. Objected was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 25 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 25 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 23 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, Masek Absent: MacLean, Moses Mulder changed from "Yea" to "Nay". And so, Amendment No. 25 was not adopted. 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1091 HB 100 Amendment No. 26 was offered by Representatives Navarre, Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Mackie, MacLean, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis:: Page 9, line 22 insert a new section to read: * Sec. _____. (a) The sum of $711,114,140 is appropriated from the general fund to the Department of Education for the purposes expressed and allocated in the amount listed for operating expenditures for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1996: Foundation program $643,401,900 Child nutrition/student lunch program 22,000,000 Cigarette tax distribution 2,655,000 Tuition students 1,731,200 Boarding home grants 185,900 Youth in detention 800,000 Pupil transportation 32,842,200 School for the Handicapped 3,705,200 Community schools 600,000 Additional District Support 3,192,740 (b) The amount allocated under (a) of this section for additional district support is further allocated to the following school districts in the amounts listed: Annette Island School District $ 166,530 Cordova School District 217,160 Craig City School District 151,890 Dillingham City School District 250,100 Galena City School District 156,160 Hoonah City School District 126,270 Hydaburg City School District 102,480 Kake City School District 136,640 Kashunamiut School District 206,180 Klawock City School District 158,600 Nenana City School District 164,090 Nome City School District 264,740 Pelican City School District 56,730 Petersburg City School District 199,470 St.Mary's School District 119,560 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1092 HB 100 Skagway City School District 115,290 Tanana City School District 122,000 Unalaska City School District 200,690 Wrangell City School District 151,890 Yakutat City School District 126,270 Renumber the following bill sections accordingly. Adjust funding sources accordingly. Representative Navarre moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 26 be adopted. Objection was heard. Representative Sanders placed a call of the House. Representative Kubina declared a conflict of interest. The call was satisfied. Representative Davies declared a conflict of interest. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 26 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 26 YEAS: 14 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Mackie, MacLean, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1093 HB 100 Excused: Barnes, Masek And so, Amendment No. 26 was not adopted. Amendment No. 27 was offered by Representative Willis: Page 33, line 4: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "15,243,300" Insert "13,743,300" Under Other Funds: Delete "15,243,300" Insert "13,743,300" Page 33, line 8: Under Allocations: Delete "3,979,900" Insert "2,479,900" Page 33, following line 20 insert: APPROPRIATION GENERAL ITEMS FUND "Senior Citizens/ Disabled Veterans Tax Relief 1,500,000 1,500,000 ALLOCATIONS Homeowners Property Tax Exemption 1,163,800 Renters' Equivalency Rebate 336,200" Renumber the following bill sections accordingly. Adjust funding sources accordingly. 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1094 HB 100 Representative Willis moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 27 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 27 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 27 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, Masek Absent: MacLean And so, Amendment No. 27 was not adopted. Amendment No. 28 was offered by Representative Elton: Page 8, lines 18 through page 9, line 4: Delete all material Insert a new section to read: "Sec. 38. The sum of $764,500 is appropriated to the Alaska marine highways fund from the general fund for payment of the monetary terms of the collective bargaining agreement between the state and the Inland Boatman's Union for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1996." Renumber the following bill sections accordingly. 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1095 HB 100 Page 37, line 22: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "5,249,000" Insert "4,484,500" Under General Fund: Delete "5,249,000" Insert "4,484,500" Page 37, line 23: Under Allocations: Delete "4,749,000" Insert "3,984,500" Adjust funding sources accordingly. Representative Elton moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 28 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 28 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 28 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, Masek 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1096 HB 100 Absent: MacLean And so, Amendment No. 28 was not adopted. Amendment No. 29 was offered by Representative Finkelstein: Page 8, line 30 through page 9, line 4: Delete all material. Insert a new bill section to read: "Sec.____. The sum of $5,563,449 is appropriated to fund the Labor, Trades and Crafts collective bargaining agreement from the following sources: General fund $5,563,449" Page 1, line 4 after "fund" (title amendment): Delete ";" Insert ", amending certain capital appropriations;" Page 9, following line 22, insert a bill section to read: "Sec. _____. Section 145, ch. 208, SLA 1990, page 115, line 6 is amended to read: The sum of $3,436,551 ($9,000,000) is appropriated from the Railbelt Energy Fund (AS 37.05.520) in the general fund to the Alaska Railroad Corporation for the purchase of locomotives, rolling stock, and associated equipment costs." Renumber the following bill sections accordingly. Adjust funding sources accordingly. Representative Finkelstein moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 29 be adopted. Objection was heard. 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1097 HB 100 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 29 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 29 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, Masek Absent: MacLean And so, Amendment No. 29 was not adopted. Amendment No. 30 was offered by Representative Kubina: Page 8, line 18-23: Delete all material. Insert a new bill section to read: "Sec.____. The sum of $5,301,372 is appropriated to fund the Supervisory unit collective bargaining agreement from the following sources: General fund $5,301,372" Page 1, line 4 after "fund" (title amendment): Delete ";" Insert ", amending certain capital appropriations;" Page 9, following line 22, insert a bill section to read: 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1098 HB 100 "Sec. _____. Section 145, ch. 208, SLA 1990, page 115, line 6 is amended to read: The sum of $3,698,628 ($9,000,000) is appropriated from the Railbelt Energy Fund (AS 37.05.520) in the general fund to the Alaska Railroad Corporation for the purchase of locomotives, rolling stock, and associated equipment costs." Renumber the following bill sections accordingly. Adjust funding sources accordingly. Representative Kubina moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 30 be adopted. Objection was heard. Representative Davies placed a call of the House, and lifted the call. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 30 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 30 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 23 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, MacLean, Martin, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, Masek Absent: Bunde, Moses 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1099 HB 100 And so, Amendment No. 30 was not adopted. Amendment No. 31 was offered by Representative Brown: Page 24, line 18: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "5,283,800" Insert "5,183,800" Under General Fund: Delete "4,626,000" Insert "4,526,000" Page 24, line 23: Under Allocations: Delete "1,145,000" Insert "1,045,000" Page 13, line 5: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "26,080,200" Insert "26,180,200" Under General Fund: Delete "14,835,900" Insert "14,935,900" Page 13, line 9: Under Allocations: Delete "3,479,500" Insert "3,579,500" Adjust funding sources accordingly. Representative Brown moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 31 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 31 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1100 HB 100 CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 31 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 21 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 4 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Kubina, Mackie, MacLean, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, Masek Absent: Bunde, Grussendorf, Kelly, Moses And so, Amendment No. 31 was not adopted. Amendment No. 32 was offered by Representative Navarre: Page 37, line 15: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "20,166,700" Insert "20,066,700" Under General Fund: Delete "20,054,700" Insert "19,954,700" Page 37, line 18: Under Allocations: Delete "500,000" Insert "400,000" Page 12, line 38: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "8,154,300" Insert "8,254,300" 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1101 HB 100 Under General Fund: Delete "8,154,300" Insert "8,254,300" Adjust funding sources accordingly. Representative Navarre moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 32 be adopted. Objection was heard. Representative MacLean placed a call of the House, and lifted the call. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 32 pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 32 YEAS: 14 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Mackie, MacLean, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, Masek And so, Amendment No. 32 was not adopted. Amendment No. 33 was not offered. 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1102 HB 100 Amendment No. 34 was offered by Representative MacLean: Page 14, line 17: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "29,404,000" Insert "29,204,000" Under General Fund: Delete "24,273,000" Insert "24,073,000" Page 16, line 34: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "414,000" Insert "614,000" Under General Fund Delete "414,000" Insert "614,000" Adjust funding sources accordingly. Representative MacLean moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 34 be adopted. Objection was heard. Representative Vezey rose to a point of order citing Section 124 of Mason's Manual. The Speaker cautioned the member to confine remarks to the amendment. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 34 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1103 HB 100 CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 34 YEAS: 14 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Mackie, MacLean, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, Masek And so, Amendment No. 34 was not adopted. Amendments No. 35, 36 and 37 were not offered. Amendment No. 38 was offered by Representative Robinson: Page 1, line 4, after "fund" (title amendment): Insert ", repealing certain capital appropriations" Page 9, following line 22, insert a new bill section to read: "* Sec. 43 Section 4(a), ch. 19, SLA 1993, is amended to read: (a) $34,300,000 Renumber following bill sections accordingly. Page 28, line 7: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "43,252,500" Insert "43,952,500" Under General Fund: Delete "40,247,600" Insert "40,947,600" 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1104 HB 100 Page 28, line 8: Under Allocations: Delete "31,365,400" Insert "32,065,400" Adjust funding sources accordingly. Representative Robinson moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 38 be adopted. Representative Parnell objected. Representative Williams placed a call of the House on all the amendments. The call was satisfied. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 38 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 38 YEAS: 10 NAYS: 28 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Mackie, MacLean, Navarre, Robinson Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Kubina, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Nicholia, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams, Willis Excused: Barnes, Masek And so, Amendment No. 38 was not adopted. 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1105 HB 100 Amendment No. 39 was offered by Representative Finkelstein: Page 28, line 13: Delete "1997" Insert "1996" Representative Finkelstein moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 39 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 39 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 39 YEAS: 14 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Mackie, MacLean, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, Masek And so, Amendment No. 39 was not adopted. Amendment No. 40 was offered by Representative Brown: Page 25, line 38: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "37,122,300" Insert "37,022,300" 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1106 HB 100 Under Other Funds: Delete "10,892,900" Insert "10,792,900" Page 26, line 17: Under Allocations: Delete "2,946,500" Insert "2,846,500" Page 34, line 26: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "129,767,100" Insert "129,867,100" Under General Fund: Delete "124,980,200" Insert "125,080,200" Page 34, line 28: Under Allocations: Delete "2,707,700" Insert "2,807,700" Adjust funding sources accordingly. Representative Brown moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 40 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 40 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 40 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1107 HB 100 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Mackie, MacLean, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Kubina, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, Masek And so, Amendment No. 40 was not adopted. Amendment No. 41 was offered by Representative Robinson: Page 37, line 22: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "5,249,000" Insert "4,249,000" Under General Fund: Delete "5,249,000" Insert "4,249,000" Page 37, line 23: Under Allocations: Delete "4,749,000" Insert "4,249,000" Page 37, line 24: Delete all material. Page 27, line 31: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "1,910,800" Insert "2,095,400" Under General Fund: Delete "1,854,300" Insert "2,038,900" 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1108 HB 100 Page 27, line 32: Under Allocations: Delete "1,488,100" Insert "1,672,700" Adjust funding sources accordingly. Representative Robinson moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 41 be adopted. Representative Parnell objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 41 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 41 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, MacLean, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, Masek And so, Amendment No. 41 was not adopted. The House stood at ease for a Minority Caucus. Amendment No. 42 was offered by Representative Brown: Page 37, line 22: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "5,249,000" Insert "5,099,000" 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1109 HB 100 Under General Fund: Delete "5,249,000" Insert "5,099,000" Page 37, line 23: Under Allocations: Delete "4,749,000" Insert "4,599,000" Page 19, line 27: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "14,814,900" Insert "14,964,900" Under General Fund: Delete "14,349,900" Insert "14,499,900" Page 19, line 28: Under Allocations: Delete "8,747,800" Insert "8,897,800" Adjust funding sources accordingly. Representative Brown moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 42 be adopted. Objection was heard. Representative Williams lifted the call. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 42 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 42 YEAS: 14 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1110 HB 100 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Mackie, MacLean, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, Masek And so, Amendment No. 42 was not adopted. Amendment No. 43 was offered by Representative B.Davis: Page 1, line 4, after "fund" (title amendment): Insert ", amending certain capital appropriations" Page 9, following line 22, insert a new bill section to read: "* Sec. 43 Section 145, ch. 208, SLA 1990, page 115, line 6 is amended to read: The sum of $8,710,500 [$9,000,000] is appropriated from the Railbelt energy fund (AS 37.05.520) in the general fund to the Alaska Railroad Corporation for the purchase of locomotives, rolling stock, and associated equipment costs." Renumber following bill sections accordingly. Page 17, line 23: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "9,602,300" Insert "9,891,800" Under General Fund: Delete "1,861,200" Insert "2,150,700" 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1111 HB 100 Page 17, line 27: Under Allocations: Delete "329,700" Insert "474,600" Page 17, line 30: Under Allocations: Delete "1,162,400" Insert "1,307,000" Adjust funding sources accordingly. Representative B.Davis moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 43 be adopted. Objection was heard. Amendment to Amendment No. 43 was offered by Representative Navarre: Delete the new bill section 23 and replace with: "* Sec. 43 Sec. 145, ch. 208, SLA 1990, page 115, line 6 is repealed." Representative Navarre moved and asked unanimous consent that the amendment to Amendment No. 43 be adopted. Objection was heard. Representative Navarre moved and asked unanimous consent that the amendment to Amendment No. 43 be withdrawn. There being no objection, it was so ordered. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 43 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1112 HB 100 CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 43 YEAS: 10 NAYS: 27 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Mackie, Nicholia, Robinson Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Kubina, MacLean, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams, Willis Excused: Barnes, Masek Absent: Navarre And so, Amendment No. 43 was not adopted. Amendment No. 44 was offered by Representative Davies: Page 33, line 4: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "15,243,300" Insert "14,743,300" Under Other Funds: Delete "15,243,300" Insert "14,743,300" Page 33, line 8: Under Allocations: Delete "3,979,900" Insert "3,479,400" Page 35, line 31: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "441,711,600" Insert "442,211,600" 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1113 HB 100 Under General Fund: Delete "166,461,700" Insert "166,961,700" Page 36, line 23: Under Allocations: Delete "127,521,700" Insert "128,021,700" Adjust funding sources accordingly. Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 44 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 44 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 44 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 23 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Bunde, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, Masek Absent: G.Davis, MacLean And so, Amendment No. 44 was not adopted. Amendment No. 45 was offered by Representative Kubina: 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1114 HB 100 Page 16, line 6: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "59,242,900" Insert "59,313,300" Under General Fund: Delete "3,495,400" Insert "3,565,800" Page 16, line 11: Under Allocations: Delete "361,800" Insert "432,200" Page 37, line 15: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "20,166,700" Insert "20,096,300" Under General Fund: Delete "20,054,700" Insert "19,984,300" Page 37, line 18: Under Allocations: Delete "6,047,000" Insert "5,976,600" Adjust funding sources accordingly. Representative Kubina moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 45 be adopted. Objection was heard. Representative Kubina declared a conflict of interest. Representative Martin placed a call of the House on all amendments, and lifted the call. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 45 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1115 HB 100 CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 45 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 23 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey Excused: Barnes, Masek Absent: MacLean, Williams And so, Amendment No. 45 was not adopted. Amendment No. 46 was offered by Representative Nicholia: Page 25, line 38: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "37,122,300" Insert "37,092,700" Under Other Funds: Delete "10,892,900" Insert "10,863,300" Page 26, line 17: Under Allocations: Delete "2,946,500" Insert "2,916,900" Page 26, line 26: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "42,318,000" Insert "42,347,600" 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1116 HB 100 Under Other Funds: Delete "11,741,600" Insert "11,771,200" Page 26, line 30: Under Allocations: Delete "11,752,400" Insert "11,782,000" Adjust funding sources accordingly. Representative Nicholia moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 46 be adopted. Objection was heard. Representative Sanders placed a call of the House, and lifted the call. **Representative MacLean was excused due to illness. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 46 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 46 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, MacLean, Masek Absent: Kubina 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1117 HB 100 And so, Amendment No. 46 was not adopted. Amendment No. 47 was offered by Representative Elton: Page 24, line 18: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "5,283,800" Insert "5,508,800" Under General Fund: Delete "4,626,000" Insert "4,851,000" Page 24, line 22: Under Allocations: Delete "2,365,300" Insert "2,590,300" Page 25, line 38: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "37,122,300" Insert "36,897,300" Under Other Funds: Delete "10,892,900" Insert "10,667,900" Page 26, line 17: Under Allocations: Delete "2,946,500" Insert "2,721,500" Adjust funding sources accordingly. Representative Elton moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 47 be adopted. Objection was heard. Representative Brown moved and asked unanimous consent that she be allowed to abstain from voting due to a conflict of interest. Objection was heard, and Representative Brown was required to vote. 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1118 HB 100 Amendment to Amendment No. 47 was offered by Representative Davies: Change funding source to General Fund as follows: "Take $150,000 from the Agricultural Revolving Loan Fund and $75,000 from the Northern Forum" Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that the amendment to Amendment No. 47 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall the amendment to Amendment No. 47 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment to Amendment No. 47 YEAS: 15 NAYS: 22 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kott, Kubina, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Sanders, Willis Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, MacLean, Masek And so, the amendment to Amendment No. 47 was not adopted. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 47 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 47 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1119 HB 100 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, MacLean, Masek And so, Amendment No. 47 was not adopted. Amendment No. 48 was offered by Representative Robinson: Page 16, line 29: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "973,100" Insert "1,418,100" Under General Fund: Delete "282,800" Insert "727,800" Page 16, line 32: Under Allocations: Delete "784,900" Insert "1,229,900" Page 37, line 15: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "20,166,700" Insert "19,941,700" Under General Fund: Delete "20,054,700" Insert "19,829,700" Page 37, line 18: Under Allocations: Delete "6,047,000" Insert "5,822,000" 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1120 HB 100 Page 1, line 4, after "fund" (title amendment): Insert", repealing certain capital appropriations" Page 9, following line 22, insert a new bill section to read: "* Sec. 43 Section 4(a), ch. 19, SLA 1993, is amended to read: (a) "34,780,000" Renumber following bill sections accordingly. Representative Robinson moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 48 be adopted. Objection was heard. The Speaker cited Section 124 of Mason's Manual and ruled the member out of order. Representative Martin placed a call of the House, and lifted the call. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 48 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 48 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 23 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, MacLean, Masek Absent: Bunde 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1121 HB 100 And so, Amendment No. 48 was not adopted. Amendment No. 49 was offered by Representative Navarre: Page 25, line 38: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "37,122,300" Insert "37,004,800" Under Other Funds: Delete "10,892,900" Insert "10,775,400" Page 26, line 17: Under Allocations: Delete "2,946,500" Insert "2,829,000" Page 14, line 17: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "29,404,000" Insert "29,521,500" Under General Fund: Delete "24,273,000" Insert "24,390,500" Adjust funding sources accordingly. Representative Navarre moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 49 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 49 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1122 HB 100 CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 49 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 23 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, MacLean, Masek Absent: Ogan And so, Amendment No. 49 was not adopted. Amendment No. 50 was offered by Representative Navarre: Page 25, line 38: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "37,122,300" Insert "37,032,300" Under Other Funds: Delete "10,892,900" Insert "10,802,900" Page 26, line 17: Under Allocations: Delete "2,946,500" Insert "2,856,500" Page 15, line 22: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "31,823,800" Insert "31,913,800" 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1123 HB 100 Under General Fund: Delete "8,819,300" Insert "8,909,300" Page 15, line 27: Under Allocations: Delete "1,043,100" Insert "1,133,100" Adjust funding sources accordingly. Representative Navarre moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 50 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 50 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 50 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Kubina, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, MacLean, Masek And so, Amendment No. 50 was not adopted. Amendment No. 51 was offered by Representative Finkelstein: 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1124 HB 100 Page 33, line 4: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "15,243,300" Insert "14,943,300" Under Other Funds: Delete "15,243,300" Insert "14,943,300" Page 33, line 8: Under Allocations: Delete "3,979,900" Insert "3,679,900" Page 22, line 32: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "30,626,700" Insert "30,926,700" Under General Fund: Delete "15,160,900" Insert "15,460,900" Page 22, line 35: Under Allocations: Delete "15,386,200" Insert "15,686,200" Adjust funding sources accordingly. Representative Finkelstein moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 51 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 51 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1125 HB 100 CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 51 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Mackie, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Navarre, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, MacLean, Masek And so, Amendment No. 51 was not adopted. Amendment No. 52 was offered by Representative Navarre: Page 29, line 11: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "195,024,800" Insert "195,424,800" Under General Fund: Delete "101,256,100" Insert "101,656,100" Page 37, line 24: Under Allocations: Delete "500,000" Insert "100,000" Page 30, line 35: Under Allocations: Delete "15,309,300" Insert "15,709,300" Adjust funding sources accordingly. 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1126 HB 100 Representative Navarre moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 52 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 52 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 52 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Grussendorf, Kubina, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, MacLean, Masek Absent: Finkelstein And so, Amendment No. 52 was not adopted. Amendment No. 53 was offered by Representative Davies: Page 1, line 4, after "fund" (title amendment): Insert ", amending certain capital appropriations" Page 9, following line 22, insert a new bill section to read: "* Sec. 43 Section 145, ch. 208, SLA 1990, page 115, line 6 is amended to read: The sum of $5,869,400 [$9,000,000] is appropriated from the Railbelt energy fund (AS 37.05.520) in the general fund to the Alaska Railroad Corporation for the purchase of locomotives, rolling stock, and associated equipment costs." 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1127 HB 100 Renumber the following bill sections accordingly. Page 33, line 21: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "56,352,200" Insert "59,482,800" Under General Fund: Delete "56,352,200" Insert "59,482,800" Page 33, line 22: Under Allocations: Delete "25,424,200" Insert "26,836,600" Page 33, line 23: Under Allocations: Delete "30,928,000" Insert "32,646,200" Adjust funding sources accordingly. Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 53 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 53 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 53 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1128 HB 100 Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, MacLean, Masek And so, Amendment No. 53 was not adopted. The House stood at ease for a Minority Caucus. Amendment No. 54 was offered by Representative Davies: Page 33, line 4: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "15,243,300" Insert "15,143,300" Under Other Funds: Delete "15,243,300" Insert "15,143,300" Page 33, line 8: Under Allocations: Delete "3,979,900" Insert "3,879,900" Page 25, line 27: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "8,646,500" Insert "8,746,500" Under General Fund: Delete "7,056,200" Insert "7,156,200" Page 25, line 29: Under Allocations: Delete "2,323,400" Insert "2,423,400" 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1129 HB 100 Adjust funding sources accordingly. Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 54 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 54 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 54 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 23 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Williams Excused: Barnes, MacLean, Masek Absent: Mackie, Vezey And so, Amendment No. 54 was not adopted. Amendment No. 55 was offered by Representative Finkelstein: Page 32, line 17: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "4,860,000" Insert "4,894,000" Under Other Funds: Delete "3,610,400" Insert "3,644,400" 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1130 HB 100 Page 32, line 18: Under Allocations: Delete "686,700" Insert "720,700" Page 33, line 4: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "15,243,300" Insert "15,209,300" Under Other Funds: Delete "15,243,300" Insert "15,209,300" Page 33, line 8: Under Allocations: Delete "3,979,900" Insert "3,945,900" Adjust funding sources accordingly. Representative Finkelstein moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 55 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 55 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 55 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1131 HB 100 Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, MacLean, Masek Absent: Mackie And so, Amendment No. 55 was not adopted. Amendment No. 56 was offered by Representative Finkelstein: Page 32, line 24: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "23,470,800" Insert "23,570,800" Under Other Funds: Delete "7,594,700" Insert "7,694,700" Page 32, line 25: Under Allocations: Delete "1,239,800" Insert "1,339,800" Page 33, line 4: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "15,243,300" Insert "15,143,300" Under Other Funds: Delete "15,243,300" Insert "15,143,300" Page 33, line 8: Under Allocations: Delete "3,979,900" Insert "3,879,900" 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1132 HB 100 Adjust funding sources accordingly. Representative Finkelstein moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 56 be adopted. Objection was heard. Representative Sanders placed a call of the House on all the amendments. The call was satisfied. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 56 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 56 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, MacLean, Masek And so, Amendment No. 56 was not adopted. Amendment No. 57 was offered by Representative Davies: Page 33, line 4: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "15,243,300" Insert "15,143,300" 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1133 HB 100 Under Other Funds: Delete "15,243,300" Insert "15,143,300" Page 33, line 8: Under Allocations: Delete "3,979,900" Insert "3,879,900" Page 25, line 38: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "37,122,300" Insert "37,222,300" Under General Fund: Delete "26,229,400" Insert "26,329,400" Page 26, line 5: Under Allocations: Delete "9,348,500" Insert "9,448,500" Adjust funding sources accordingly. Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 57 be adopted. Objection was heard. Representative Ogan declared a conflict of interest. Representative Brown moved and asked unanimous consent that the question be divided. The Speaker ruled the question was divisible. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall the question be divided?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1134 HB 100 CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 57 Divide the Question YEAS: 12 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Foster, Grussendorf, Kubina, Mackie, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Brice, Bunde, G.Davis, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Navarre, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, MacLean, Masek And so, the motion failed. Amendment to Amendment No. 57 was offered by Representative Davies: "Change the funding source to General Fund." Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that the amendment to Amendment No. 57 be adopted. Objection was heard. Representative Porter rose to a point of order citing Section 180 of Mason's Manual. The Speaker stated the point was well taken. The question being: "Shall the amendment to Amendment No. 57 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1135 HB 100 CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment to Amendment No. 57 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Mackie, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Navarre, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, MacLean, Masek And so, the amendment to Amendment No. 57 was not adopted. The Speaker invoked Section 102 of Mason's Manual. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 57 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 57 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, MacLean, Masek And so, Amendment No. 57 was not adopted. 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1136 HB 100 Amendment No. 58 was offered by Representative Finkelstein: Page 32, line 24: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "23,470,800" Insert "23,658,500" Under General Fund: Delete "15,876,100" Insert "16,063,800" Page 32, line 26: Under Allocations: Delete "1,082,900" Insert "1,270,600" Page 37, line 22: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "5,249,000" Insert "4,061,300" Under General Fund: Delete "5,249,000" Insert "4,061,300" Page 37, line 23: Under Allocations: Delete "4,749,000" Insert "4,561,300" Adjust funding sources accordingly. Representative Finkelstein moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 58 be adopted. Objection was heard. Representative Robinson declared a conflict of interest. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 58 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1137 HB 100 CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 58 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, MacLean, Masek And so, Amendment No. 58 was not adopted. Amendment No. 59 was offered by Representative Davies: Page 33, line 4: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "15,243,300" Insert "15,168,700" Under Other Funds: Delete "15,243,300" Insert "15,168,700" Page 33, line 8: Under Allocations: Delete "3,979,900" Insert "3,905,300" Page 25, line 38: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "37,122,300" Insert "37,196,900" 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1138 HB 100 Under General Fund: Delete "26,229,400" Insert "26,304,000" Page 26, line 9: Under Allocations: Delete "2,599,800" Insert "2,674,400" Adjust funding sources accordingly. Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 59 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 59 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 59 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, MacLean, Masek And so, Amendment No. 59 was not adopted. Amendment No. 60 was offered by Representative Nicholia: 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1139 HB 100 Page 25, line 38: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "37,122,300" Insert "36,722,300" Under Other Funds: Delete "10,892,900" Insert "10,492,900" Page 26, line 17: Under Allocations: Delete "2,946,500" Insert "2,546,500" Page 33, line 37: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "22,830,900" Insert "23,230,900" Under Other Funds: Delete "20,317,200" Insert "20,717,200" Page 34, line 10: Under Allocations: Delete "1,367,100" Insert "1,717,100" Adjust funding sources accordingly. Representative Nicholia moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 60 be adopted. Objection was heard. Representative Sanders lifted the call. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 60 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1140 HB 100 CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 60 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 23 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, MacLean, Masek Absent: Parnell And so, Amendment No. 60 was not adopted. Amendment No. 61 was offered by Representative Elton: Page 24, line 18: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "5,283,800" Insert "5,483,800" Under General Fund: Delete "4,626,000" Insert "4,826,000" Page 24, line 20: Under Allocations: Delete "565,900" Insert "765,900" Page 25, line 38: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "37,122,300" Insert "36,922,300" 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1141 HB 100 Under Other Funds: Delete "10,892,900" Insert "10,692,900" Page 26, line 17: Under Allocations: Delete "2,946,500" Insert "2,746,500" Adjust funding sources accordingly. Representative Elton moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 61 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 61 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 61 YEAS: 7 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 6 Yeas: Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Mackie, Navarre, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, MacLean, Masek Absent: Brice, Brown, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Nicholia And so, Amendment No. 61 was not adopted. Amendment No. 62 was offered by Representative Nicholia: 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1142 HB 100 Page 25, line 38: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "37,122,300" Insert "36,972,300" Under Other Funds: Delete "10,892,900" Insert "10,742,900" Page 26, line 17: Under Allocations: Delete "2,946,500" Insert "2,796,500" Page 33, line 37: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "22,830,900" Insert "23,980,900" Under Other Funds: Delete "20,317,200" Insert "20,467,200" Page 34, line 10: Under Allocations: Delete "1,367,100" Insert "1,517,100" Adjust funding sources accordingly. Representative Nicholia moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 62 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 62 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1143 HB 100 CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 62 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 22 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 3 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Kubina, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey Excused: Barnes, MacLean, Masek Absent: Grussendorf, Ivan, Williams And so, Amendment No. 62 was not adopted. Amendment No. 63 was offered by Representative Elton: Page 24, line 28: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "8,530,400" Insert "9,280,400" Under General Funds: Delete "8,530,400" Insert "9,280,400" Page 24, line 30: Under Allocations: Delete "5,492,900" Insert "6,242,900" Page 25, line 38: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "37,122,300" Insert "36,372,300" 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1144 HB 100 Under Other Funds: Delete "10,892,900" Insert "10,142,900" Page 26, line 17: Under Allocations: Delete "2,946,500" Insert "2,196,500" Adjust funding sources accordingly. Representative Elton moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 63 be adopted. Objection was heard. Amendment to Amendment No. 63 was offered by Representative Kubina: "Change funding source from the Agricultural Revolving Loan Fund to the 1990 appropriation for Wishbone Hill Coal Cars." Representative Kubina moved and asked unanimous consent that the amendment to Amendment No. 63 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall the amendment to Amendment No. 63 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment to Amendment No. 63 YEAS: 10 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1145 HB 100 Nays: Austerman, Brice, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams, Willis Excused: Barnes, MacLean, Masek Absent: Mackie And so, the amendment to Amendment No. 63 was not adopted. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 63 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 63 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Kubina, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, MacLean, Masek Absent: Mackie And so, Amendment No. 63 was not adopted. Amendment No. 64 was offered by Representative Brice: Page 8, line 18 through page 9, line 4: Delete all material. Renumber the following bill sections accordingly. 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1146 HB 100 Representative Brice moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 64 be adopted. Objection was heard. Representative Bunde placed a call of the House and lifted the call. Representative Grussendorf placed a call of the House. The call was satisfied. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 64 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 64 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, MacLean, Masek And so, Amendment No. 64 was not adopted. Amendment No. 65 was offered by Representative Davies: Page 24, line 18: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "5,283,800" Insert "5,183,800" 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1147 HB 100 Under General Fund: Delete "4,626,000" Insert "4,526,000" Page 24, line 23: Under Allocations: Delete "1,145,000" Insert "1,045,000" Page 26, line 18: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "7,894,100" Insert "7,994,100" Under General Fund: Delete "5,621,600" Insert "5,721,600" Page 26, line 21: Under Allocations: Delete "6,696,800" Insert "6,796,800" Adjust funding sources accordingly. Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 65 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 65 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 65 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 22 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 3 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1148 HB 100 Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, MacLean, Masek Absent: Foster, Mackie, Sanders And so, Amendment No. 65 was not adopted. Amendment No. 66 was offered by Representative Willis: Page 37, line 22: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "5,249,000" Insert "5,117,000" Under General Fund: Delete "5,249,000" Insert "5,117,000" Page 37, line 24: Under Allocations: Delete "500,000" Insert "368,000" Page 21, line 23: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "61,715,300" Insert "61,847,300" Under General Fund: Delete "23,153,600" Insert "23,285,600" Page 21, line 24: Under Allocations: Delete "14,123,300" Insert "14,255,300" 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1149 HB 100 Page 21, after line 24, insert: "It is the intent of the Legislature that an additional $132,000 will go to the Municipality of Anchorage for the re-establishment of the Eagle River Public Health office." Adjust funding sources accordingly. Representative Willis moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 66 be adopted. Objection was heard. Representative Kubina placed a call of the House. The call was satisfied. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 66 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 66 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, MacLean, Masek And so, Amendment No. 66 was not adopted. Amendment No. 67 was offered by Representative Davies: 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1150 HB 100 Page 33, line 4: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "15,243,300" Insert "12,243,300" Under Other Funds: Delete "15,243,300" Insert "12,243,300" Page 33, line 8: Under Allocations: Delete "3,979,900" Insert "979,900" Page 35, line 31: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "441,711,600" Insert "444,711,600" Under General Fund: Delete "166,461,700" Insert "169,461,700" Adjust funding sources accordingly. Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 67 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 67 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 67 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1151 HB 100 Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, MacLean, Masek And so, Amendment No. 67 was not adopted. Amendment No. 68 was offered by Representative Davies: Page 24, line 18: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "5,283,800" Insert "5,208,800" Under General Fund: Delete "4,626,000" Insert "4,551,000" Page 24, line 23: Under Allocations: Delete "1,145,000" Insert "1,070,000" Page 37, line 11: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "6,329,900" Insert "6,404,900" Under General Fund: Delete "6,329,900" Insert "6,404,900" Page 37, line 12: Under Allocations: Delete "2,743,000" Insert "2,818,000" Adjust funding sources accordingly. 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1152 HB 100 Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 68 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 68 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 68 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, MacLean, Masek And so, Amendment No. 68 was not adopted. Amendment No. 69 was offered by Representative Davies: Page 33, line 4: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "15,243,300" Insert "14,943,300" Under Other funds: Delete "15,243,300" Insert "14,943,300" Page 33, line 8: Under Allocations: Delete "3,979,900" Insert "3,679,900" 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1153 HB 100 Page 35, line 31: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "441,711,600" Insert "442,011,600" Under General Fund: Delete "166,461,700" Insert "166,761,700" Page 35, line 34: Under Allocations: Delete "9,275,900" Insert "9,575,900" Adjust funding source accordingly. Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 69 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 69 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 69 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Mackie, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, MacLean, Masek Absent: Navarre 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1154 HB 100 And so, Amendment No. 69 was not adopted. Amendment No. 70 was offered by Representative Davies: Page 33, line 4: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "15,243,300" Insert "14,943,300" Under Other funds: Delete "15,243,300" Insert "14,943,300" Page 33, line 8: Under Allocations: Delete "3,979,900" Insert "3,679,900" Page 35, line 31: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "441,711,600" Insert "442,011,600" Under General Fund: Delete "166,461,700" Insert "166,761,700" Page 36, line 23: Under Allocations: Delete "127,521,700" Insert "127,821,700" Adjust funding source accordingly. Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 70 be adopted. Objection was heard. 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1155 HB 100 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 70 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 70 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 23 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 3 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, MacLean, Masek Absent: Mackie, Navarre, Sanders And so, Amendment No. 70 was not adopted. Amendment No. 71 was offered by Representative Davies: Page 33, line 4: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "15,243,300" Insert "15,132,000" Under Other funds: Delete "15,243,300" Insert "15,132,000" Page 33, line 8: Under Allocations: Delete "3,979,900" Insert "3,868,600" 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1156 HB 100 Page 35, line 31: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "441,711,600" Insert "441,938,000" Under General Fund: Delete "166,461,700" Insert "166,573,000" Page 36, line 31: Under Allocations: Delete "18,223,500" Insert "18,334,800" Adjust funding source accordingly. Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 71 be adopted. Objection was heard. Representative Toohey placed a call of the House and lifted the call. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 71 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 71 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Mackie, Martin, Moses, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, MacLean, Masek 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1157 HB 100 Absent: Mulder And so, Amendment No. 71 was not adopted. Amendment Nos. 72, 73 and 74 were not offered. Amendment No. 75 was offered by Representative Davies: Page 33, line 4: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "15,243,300" Insert "14,163,800" Under Other funds: Delete "15,243,300" Insert "14,163,800" Page 33, line 8: Under Allocations: Delete "3,979,900" Insert "2,900,400" Page 35, line 31: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "441,711,600" Insert "442,791,100" Under General Fund: Delete "166,461,700" Insert "167,541,200" Page 36, line 6: Under Allocations: Delete "9,275,900" Insert "10,355,400" Adjust funding source accordingly. Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 75 be adopted. 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1158 HB 100 Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 75 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 75 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Brice, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, MacLean, Masek And so, Amendment No. 75 was not adopted. Amendment No. 76 was not offered. Amendment No. 77 was offered by Representative Brown: Page 1, line 4 after "fund" (title amendment): Insert ", repealing certain capital appropriations" Page 9, following line 22, insert a new bill section to read: " Sec. 43. Section 145, ch. 208, SLA 1990 is repealed and the unexpended and unobligated balance of the appropriation, including accrued interest, lapses into the general fund." Renumber the following bill sections accordingly. Representative Brown moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 77 be adopted. 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1159 HB 100 Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 77 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 77 YEAS: 10 NAYS: 27 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson Nays: Austerman, Brice, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Kubina, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams, Willis Excused: Barnes, MacLean, Masek And so, Amendment No. 77 was not adopted. Amendment No. 78 was offered by Representative Brown: Page 1, line 4 after "fund" (title amendment): Insert ", repealing certain capital appropriations" Page 9, following line 22, insert a new bill section to read: "Sec. 43. Section 4(a), ch. 19, SLA 1993, is repealed and the unexpended and unobligated balance of the appropriation, including accrued interest, lapses into the general fund." Renumber following bill sections accordingly. Representative Brown moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 78 be adopted. Objection was heard. 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1160 HB 100 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 78 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 78 YEAS: 7 NAYS: 30 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Navarre, Robinson Nays: Austerman, Brice, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Kubina, Mackie, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Nicholia, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams, Willis Excused: Barnes, MacLean, Masek And so, Amendment No. 78 was not adopted. Amendment Nos. 79, 80 and 81 were not offered. Amendment No. 82 was offered by Representative Finkelstein: Page 25, line 38: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "37,122,300" Insert "36,992,300" Under Other funds: Delete "10,892,900" Insert "10,762,900" Page 26, line 17: Under Allocations: Delete "2,946,500" Insert "2,816,500" 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1161 HB 100 Page 14, line 29: Under Appropriation Items: Delete "18,888,600" Insert "19,018,600" Page 14, line 32: Under Allocations: Delete "16,276,600" Insert "16,406,600" Adjust funding source accordingly. Representative Finkelstein moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 82 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 82 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 82 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Kubina, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, MacLean, Masek And so, Amendment No. 82 was not adopted. Representative Navarre moved and asked unanimous consent that the House rescind previous action in failing to adopt Amendment No. 1 (page 1054). 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1162 HB 100 Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall the House rescind previous action in failing to adopt Amendment No. 1?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Rescind previous action/Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, MacLean, Masek And so, the motion failed. Representative Vezey moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 100(FIN) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final passage. Representative Brown objected. CSHB 100(FIN) will be in third reading on the April 7, 1995, calendar. Representative Navarre moved and asked unanimous consent that the House rescind previous action in failing to adopt Amendment No. 2 (page 1055). Objection was heard. 1995-04-06 House Journal Page 1163 HB 100 The question being: "Shall the House rescind previous action in failing to adopt Amendment No. 2?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 100(FIN) Second Reading Rescind previous action/Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 23 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Grussendorf, Kubina, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Nays: Austerman, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Excused: Barnes, MacLean, Masek Absent: Bunde, Finkelstein And so, the motion failed.